Decoding the ancient novel : the reader and the role of description in Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius / Shadi Bartsch.
Por: Bartsch, Shadi.Tipo de material: LibroEditor: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1989Descripción: x, 201 p.ISBN: 9780691606910.Materia(s): Heliodoro de Émesa | Aquiles Tacio | LITERATURA GRIEGA | DESCRIPCION LITERARIA | NOVELAS | LECTOR | LEUCIPE Y CLITOFONTE | ETIÓPICAS | NARRATOLOGÍA | SEGUNDA SOFÍSTICA
|Tipo de ítem||Ubicación actual||Signatura||Estado||Fecha de vencimiento|
|Libro de Proyecto de Investigación||Biblioteca del Instituto de Filología Clásica||VI-6 (Navegar estantería)||Disponible|
1. Description and interpretation in the Second Sophistic -- 2. Pictorial description: clues, conventions, girls and gardens -- 3. Dreams, oracles, and oracular dreams: misinterpretation and motivation -- 4. Description of spectacles: the reader as audience, the author as playwright -- 5. The other descriptions: relation to narrative and reader -- 6. The role of description -- Appendix: summaries of Leucippe and Clitophon and the Aethiopica
Using a reader-oriented approach, Shadi Bartsch reconsiders the role of detailed descriptive accounts in the ancient Greek novels of Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius and in so doing offers a new view of the genre itself. Bartsch demonstrates that these passages, often misunderstood as mere ornamental devices, form in fact an integral part of the narrative proper, working to activate the audience's awareness of the play of meaning in the story. As the crucial elements in the evolution of a relationship in which the author arouses and then undermines the expectations of his readership, these passages provide the key to a better understanding and interpretation of these two most sophisticated of the ancient Greek romances.
In many works of the Second Sophistic, descriptions of visual conveyors of meaning--artworks and dreams--signaled the presence of a deeper meaning. This meaning was revealed in the texts themselves through an interpretation furnished by the author. The two novels at hand, however, manipulate this convention of hermeneutic description by playing upon their readers' expectations and luring them into the trap of incorrect exegesis. Employed for different ends in the context of each work, this process has similar implications in both for the relationship between reader and author as it arises out of the former's involvement with the text.